<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Done Right &#187; enterprise search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchdoneright.com/tag/enterprise_search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchdoneright.com</link>
	<description>Enterprise Search Expertise, Brought To You By Vivísimo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:50:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Acquisition of Fast</title>
		<link>http://searchdoneright.com/2008/01/microsofts-acquisition-of-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://searchdoneright.com/2008/01/microsofts-acquisition-of-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Raul Valdes-Perez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forrester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-end enterprise search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oem customers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchdoneright.com/2008/01/microsofts-acquisition-of-fast/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has stated that it bought Fast to become a one-stop shop for enterprise search at the high end as well as at the low/medium end (&#8220;infrastructure search&#8221;). This is a compelling $1.2B argument that high-end search is what enterprises need, contrary to previous claims about infrastructure search being good enough.
[An alternative hypothesis is that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://searchdoneright.com/2008/01/microsofts-acquisition-of-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Point Solutions Miss the Point</title>
		<link>http://searchdoneright.com/2007/12/why-point-solutions-miss-the-point/</link>
		<comments>http://searchdoneright.com/2007/12/why-point-solutions-miss-the-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Raul Valdes-Perez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search platform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchdoneright.com/2007/12/why-point-solutions-miss-the-point/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe that some purchasers of enterprise search are making a mistake, understandable as it may be, which they don&#8217;t make in other purchasing decisions: they go for point solutions which will prove inadequate soon after deployment.
A point solution solves an immediate, specific need.  Now, what could be wrong with that??
Let&#8217;s consider point solutions [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://searchdoneright.com/2007/12/why-point-solutions-miss-the-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
