<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Down With Lists! Different Ways to Present Search Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchdoneright.com/2009/07/down-with-lists-different-ways-to-present-search-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchdoneright.com/2009/07/down-with-lists-different-ways-to-present-search-results/</link>
	<description>Enterprise Search Expertise, Brought To You By Vivísimo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:31:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hornak</title>
		<link>http://searchdoneright.com/2009/07/down-with-lists-different-ways-to-present-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-57035</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hornak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchdoneright.com/?p=396#comment-57035</guid>
		<description>Agreed, the way search results are displayed is extremely important especially as more search engine&#039;s are providing this type of result including the major players Google, Bing and Yahoo(probably not much longer, since being taken over by Bing).

As we move forward this is going to be more important and not only how you show specific data but also how you organize a number of different types of information on a single page. It could be you search for Pittsburgh, PA and it shows a map, weather, news results, social media posts and organic results all on one page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, the way search results are displayed is extremely important especially as more search engine&#8217;s are providing this type of result including the major players Google, Bing and Yahoo(probably not much longer, since being taken over by Bing).</p>
<p>As we move forward this is going to be more important and not only how you show specific data but also how you organize a number of different types of information on a single page. It could be you search for Pittsburgh, PA and it shows a map, weather, news results, social media posts and organic results all on one page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Tindell</title>
		<link>http://searchdoneright.com/2009/07/down-with-lists-different-ways-to-present-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-56501</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Tindell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchdoneright.com/?p=396#comment-56501</guid>
		<description>Andrew,
Great overall concept that I agree with, whole heartedly. Less is more and a picture is worth a thousand words.  Your example of the weather shows clearly the expectation that the user anticipates.  IE, maps, graphics, charts and polygons of weather information at that moment. Graphical interaction is huge for keeping them on site and returning again.

The problem comes to play when the information ingested is so broad in its nature, as well as the way the queries are formed. Weather has a narrow focus that is understood.  With internet search it’s difficult to read the users mind so we end up using the default list. We do need to look at giving them options that helps them discover more areas using  faceted navigation, entity display (people, places, things,) similar information or suggestions on what others have searched for, category breakouts or clustering of content.  

The key is finding what will work for your content and customers now, as well as continually looking at new ways to present results and interaction since what is new today will be the old black tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,<br />
Great overall concept that I agree with, whole heartedly. Less is more and a picture is worth a thousand words.  Your example of the weather shows clearly the expectation that the user anticipates.  IE, maps, graphics, charts and polygons of weather information at that moment. Graphical interaction is huge for keeping them on site and returning again.</p>
<p>The problem comes to play when the information ingested is so broad in its nature, as well as the way the queries are formed. Weather has a narrow focus that is understood.  With internet search it’s difficult to read the users mind so we end up using the default list. We do need to look at giving them options that helps them discover more areas using  faceted navigation, entity display (people, places, things,) similar information or suggestions on what others have searched for, category breakouts or clustering of content.  </p>
<p>The key is finding what will work for your content and customers now, as well as continually looking at new ways to present results and interaction since what is new today will be the old black tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://searchdoneright.com/2009/07/down-with-lists-different-ways-to-present-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-56466</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchdoneright.com/?p=396#comment-56466</guid>
		<description>Andrew,  Right on... dig the historical reference!  Very apropos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,  Right on&#8230; dig the historical reference!  Very apropos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
