<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Thrill of Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchdoneright.com/2007/06/the-thrill-of-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchdoneright.com/2007/06/the-thrill-of-search/</link>
	<description>Enterprise Search Expertise, Brought To You By Vivísimo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:31:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay Skinner</title>
		<link>http://searchdoneright.com/2007/06/the-thrill-of-search/comment-page-1/#comment-23392</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchdoneright.com/2007/06/the-thrill-of-search/#comment-23392</guid>
		<description>What about seaching using MSN? Talk about irrelevancy. I don&#039;t even use that search engine anymore. Is that why they want to buy yahoo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about seaching using MSN? Talk about irrelevancy. I don&#8217;t even use that search engine anymore. Is that why they want to buy yahoo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Crawford - Tampa, Florida</title>
		<link>http://searchdoneright.com/2007/06/the-thrill-of-search/comment-page-1/#comment-12916</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Crawford - Tampa, Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 05:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchdoneright.com/2007/06/the-thrill-of-search/#comment-12916</guid>
		<description>Your right, but it could be worse ... try yahoo if you really want to see the meaning of irrelevancy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your right, but it could be worse &#8230; try yahoo if you really want to see the meaning of irrelevancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Bremm</title>
		<link>http://searchdoneright.com/2007/06/the-thrill-of-search/comment-page-1/#comment-8286</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Bremm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 06:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchdoneright.com/2007/06/the-thrill-of-search/#comment-8286</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m certain vivisimo will not find any hidden checks in my email vault, but the &quot;root discovery&quot; is awesome. 
For example, when you type in my name, Martin Bremm, vivisimo will show you a lot of German&#039;s beautiful places. While my family and I live in Leesburg, VA (US) since over 5 years now, my ancestors are form the &quot;Mosel&quot; area, that mainly produces wine for export and ravishing views for visitors and tourists. In fact, some of my grand grand parents owned 3/4 of Zell; there is a little river called Bremm, we had a real knight etc. 

Google doesn&#039;t do that (can I say this here??)

Sure enough, in today&#039;s world of data (i.e. not information) overflow, produced by technology and in breathtaking speed we do need more technology to extract useful &quot;information&quot;. 

Plain lists of regular search engines worked &quot;ok&quot; 2-3 years ago and before everyone knew about the trillions of webpages and how to produce tons of more related and unrelated content. 

Unfortunately, that&#039;s not how our brain works; thus classification and its upcoming ASSOCIATIONS within PERSONAL CONTEXT is of essence in next generation &quot;information discovery tools&quot;. It instantly creates a browsable &quot;mini universe&quot; based on my very own preferences.

Well, looking for &quot;computer&quot; in google produces whopping 664,000,000 results. If I want to find anything useful, I need to know beforehand, what might be in this big bit bucket and assume some context. Too bad if I&#039;m using a different language (was it &#039;pc&#039; or &#039;computer&#039; or &#039;notebook&#039; or &#039;laptop&#039; or just &#039;home comuter&#039;?).  Anyways, so much for &#039;aggravation&#039;. With all the popularity I have no clue, why google doesn&#039;t use more advanced concepts of content classification.

On the other hand, vivisimo catches even more results, but the classifyer simply &quot;guides&quot; me to the nearest neighbour. I tell you, I LOVE information hiding and filtering on user level so much...

Anyways. thanks for listening to my post; keep up the good work and grow.

Cheers,
Martin.
 
PS: If I could make a wish, it would put the &quot;search for more results like this&quot; as little icon on any entry of the cluster tree. speed++.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m certain vivisimo will not find any hidden checks in my email vault, but the &#8220;root discovery&#8221; is awesome.<br />
For example, when you type in my name, Martin Bremm, vivisimo will show you a lot of German&#8217;s beautiful places. While my family and I live in Leesburg, VA (US) since over 5 years now, my ancestors are form the &#8220;Mosel&#8221; area, that mainly produces wine for export and ravishing views for visitors and tourists. In fact, some of my grand grand parents owned 3/4 of Zell; there is a little river called Bremm, we had a real knight etc. </p>
<p>Google doesn&#8217;t do that (can I say this here??)</p>
<p>Sure enough, in today&#8217;s world of data (i.e. not information) overflow, produced by technology and in breathtaking speed we do need more technology to extract useful &#8220;information&#8221;. </p>
<p>Plain lists of regular search engines worked &#8220;ok&#8221; 2-3 years ago and before everyone knew about the trillions of webpages and how to produce tons of more related and unrelated content. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, that&#8217;s not how our brain works; thus classification and its upcoming ASSOCIATIONS within PERSONAL CONTEXT is of essence in next generation &#8220;information discovery tools&#8221;. It instantly creates a browsable &#8220;mini universe&#8221; based on my very own preferences.</p>
<p>Well, looking for &#8220;computer&#8221; in google produces whopping 664,000,000 results. If I want to find anything useful, I need to know beforehand, what might be in this big bit bucket and assume some context. Too bad if I&#8217;m using a different language (was it &#8216;pc&#8217; or &#8216;computer&#8217; or &#8216;notebook&#8217; or &#8216;laptop&#8217; or just &#8216;home comuter&#8217;?).  Anyways, so much for &#8216;aggravation&#8217;. With all the popularity I have no clue, why google doesn&#8217;t use more advanced concepts of content classification.</p>
<p>On the other hand, vivisimo catches even more results, but the classifyer simply &#8220;guides&#8221; me to the nearest neighbour. I tell you, I LOVE information hiding and filtering on user level so much&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyways. thanks for listening to my post; keep up the good work and grow.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Martin.</p>
<p>PS: If I could make a wish, it would put the &#8220;search for more results like this&#8221; as little icon on any entry of the cluster tree. speed++.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
